Letter to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on the alleged climate change sent and signed 500 distinguished scientists from around the world

In the letter of scientists, it is written and underlined that “there is no emergency for the climate”.

A global network of more than 500 scientists with knowledge and professional experience in the climate and other relevant sectors has sent the UN SG the European climate Declaration. These scientists are the national ambassadors of their countries.

The letter emphasises that the general climate models on which the global climate policy is based, are not appropriate for this purpose.

Therefore, it is cruel and absurd to support the wasted trillion based on results from such immature models.

The current climate policies unnecessarily undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries that do not have access to affordable (relatively inexpensive), continuous electricity.

Scientists urge the UN SG to pursue a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economic policy and real interest in those who are harmed by the costly and unnecessary efforts announced.

They also demand that the European climate Declaration be placed on the agenda of the forthcoming UN summit in New York.

Scientists call on the UN SG to organise a high-level constructive climate conference with scientists from all sides in early 2020.

The purpose of the Conference will be the realization of the healthy and ancient principle of healthy science, which requires that all views be fully and accurately heard.

According to the 500 distinguished scientists who sent the letter to the UN Secretary-General, climate science should not be a political issue. Climate issues and climate policies should be scientific. Scientists should openly expose uncertainties and excesses to their projections for global warming. Politicians will have to rely passionately on the real benefits and actual costs of the policies that will follow.

Geological records reveal that the Earth’s climate is changing throughout its existence. There were warm and cold periods due to natural phenomena. The Little Ice Age just ended in 1850. Therefore, it makes sense to enter the planet in a period of temperature increase.

It is not only the man-made factors that alter the climate, but there are natural causes.

Warming does not happen at the speed predicted. The planet has warmed up to less than half the rhythm, than predicted. The anthropogenic rhythm that causes heat on the planet is less than half. This teaches us that we do not actually perceive climate change.

Climate policy is based on inadequate models supported by scientists. Climate models have many weaknesses and should not be policy tools. Models exaggerate the greenhouse effect and CO2 emissions. In addition, the models ignore the fact that the enrichment of the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

The 500 scientists stress that CO2 is food for plants, which are the basis of life on Earth. The CO2 is emphasized that it is not a pollutant. It is necessary for the Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. The increase in CO2 levels is beneficial for nature and helps the earth to become greener.

Most CO2 in the air promotes the growth of global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of cultivation worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters, it is emphasized by the 500 specialists. There is no statistic to suggest that global warming has intensified hurricanes, floods, droughts and similar natural disasters, or has made them more frequent.

CO2 mitigation measures are equally damaging and costly, scientists support. For example, wind turbines kill birds and bats, and palm oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of tropical forests.

Politics must respect the scientific and economic truths scientists say. There is no climate emergency. For this reason, there is no need for panic and alarm.

The 500 scientists stress that they are vertically opposed to the harmful and unrealistic policy of zero CO2 emissions proposed for 2050. If better approaches come to the fore, there is plenty of time to adopt them. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and cheap energy continuously for the entire planet.

Really, why is the UN and all those who believe in anthropogenic climate change that will destroy the planet deny the ceremony of a scientific conference where all scientific opinions and scientific data will be heard?
Because anyone who does not accept anthropogenic climate change is baptized as a “lamb” and is thrown in the fire of the Holy Inquisition as if we are in the Middle Ages and not in the twentieth first century?
Do those who strive to persuade mankind of anthropogenic climate change and the “necessity” of zero CO2 emissions have adopted fascist behaviour against all others who do not believe that man is responsible?

It is time for the ΝWO supporters to accept democracy and to come to dialogue with those who have an opposing view of their own, for all the serious problems that concern mankind.

Source: cosmostatus.blogspot.com

SOURCE http://cosmostatus.blogspot.com/2019/09/500.html